Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2015-09-03 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 score. The Moto Z2 Force Edition body is newer, way thinner and notably lighter than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a lot more mega pixels back camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.