Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Oxford blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting an 84.6 score against 74.1. The Motorola One 5G design is notably newer and much thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a slightly better screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater amount of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola One 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 2 more cores.
Motorola One 5G counts with a much better battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One 5G captures much better photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations, a much better resolution camera in the back and a larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.