Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a general score of 79.8 against 74.1. Motorola One Hyper's construction is extremely newer and noticeably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Motorola One Hyper features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher number of faster cores and more RAM.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features just a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Motorola One Hyper has much more storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Motorola One Hyper has better battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.