Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 overall score. The Motorola One Vision is a notably newer and thinner cellphone than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it is a little heavier. Motorola One Vision has a bit superior processing unit than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Motorola One Vision has a much greater memory for applications and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola One Vision features just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision has a better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.