Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a overall score of 87 against 74.1. The Motorola razr (2020) design is incredibly newer and way thinner, but a bit heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola razr (2020) has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2800mAh. Motorola razr (2020) features a superior camera than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.