Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is slightly better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a global score of 81.1 against 74.1. The Motorola razr (2022) design is noticeably newer and noticeably thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it is also heavier. Motorola razr (2022) has a greater hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola razr (2022) takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little longer battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.