Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is slightly better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a general score of 75.8 against 74.1. Although nubia Red Magic 3S is heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's thinner and also newer. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a better performing CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM memory and 2 more processing cores.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much better videos and photos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a bigger aperture for better low light captures, a much better video resolution and a camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a way better battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.