Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a global score of 83.1 against 74.1. Even though OPPO Find X2 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's extremely thinner and also newer. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger screen, a little more pixels per display inch and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more memory to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos, a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, higher video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.