Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a overall score of 82.1 against 74.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's a lot thinner and also extremely newer. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much greater display density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) and the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G count with really similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a camera with lot more MP and a larger aperture, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Galaxy A13 5G has a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.