Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A21s is slightly better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a general score of 77.7 against 74.1. Galaxy A21s's body is much newer and a lot thinner, but also just a little heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a much better display density.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a slightly better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 384 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A21s counts with a little better processing power than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Galaxy A21s also has more processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A21s counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy A21s shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A21s also has a lot more MP camera in the back and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.