Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 score. Galaxy A22 5G's design is a lot newer and thinner, but also heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a little better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A22 5G's camera is just as good as the camera in Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although the Galaxy A22 5G has a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a much higher resolution back camera, they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G features a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.