Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s global score of 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a newer and a lot thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it's also just a little bit heavier. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a much faster processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 3 GB less RAM and less CPU cores (but faster).
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality photographs, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more MP and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.