Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with an 81.3 score against 74.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A31 is a bit heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's much thinner and incredibly newer. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy A31 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Galaxy A31 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a F2 camera aperture, the Galaxy A31 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A31 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A31 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A31 has a much longer battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.