Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 LTE Only is better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having an 82 score against 74.1. Galaxy A32 LTE Only's body is much newer, lighter and a lot thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a little bit better screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit inferior pixels amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM memory and 2 more cores. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lot smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a larger aperture and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a very superior battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.