Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-09-03 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has an overall score of 82.9, which is much better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a extremely thinner and noticeably lighter phone than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Samsung Galaxy A34 has a little better processing power than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A34, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 128 GB.
The Galaxy A34 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a smaller back camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.