Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a general score of 81.7 against 74.1. Galaxy A41 is a way newer phone, and it is also noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel amount per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Galaxy A41 features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A41 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A41 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rate and a F2 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a larger sensor and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy A41 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.