Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a overall score of 83.8 against 74.1. Galaxy A50 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Galaxy A50 counts with a little better processing power than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 1 GB more RAM and 2 more cpu cores.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower 21 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features greater battery performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.