Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a general score of 90.8 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is notably newer and way thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it's just a bit heavier. The Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better amount of pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A51 5G takes much better videos and photos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a lot better resolution back camera.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.