Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a overall score of 91.3 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is much newer and extremely thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher display density.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger amount of RAM and more processing cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 50% greater battery capacity. Galaxy A52 5G shoots better photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.