Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-03 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 score. Samsung Galaxy A6's design is extremely newer, a little lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a sharper display than Galaxy A6, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, a bit bigger display and a way better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A6, although it has lesser processing cores (although faster), they both have a 3 GB RAM memory. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a bit more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) and Samsung Galaxy A6 feature quite similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.