Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-09-03 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 is a bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a score of 77.7 against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy C7 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and a lot thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Galaxy C7 has a little bit better processing power than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel density. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a much better camera than Galaxy C7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy C7's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) one, they have a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 128 GB and equal internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy C7 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.