Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s global score of 74.1. The Galaxy F23 is a newer cellphone, and it's also much lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit better looking display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen density.
The Galaxy F23 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a much worse 21 megapixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy F23 has a really longer battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.