Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a score of 88.1 against 74.1. Even though the Galaxy F62 is somewhat heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's somewhat thinner and also extremely newer. Galaxy F62 has a bit superior CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has lesser processing cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy F62 features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior battery life than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 7000mAh battery size. The Galaxy F62 takes better videos and photos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a much more mega pixels back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.