Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 score. Even though the Galaxy M20 is just a bit heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's much thinner and also much newer. Galaxy M20 features a bit better processing unit than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a little bit better screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel number per inch of display. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a way larger camera sensor.
The Galaxy M20 features a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy M20 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.