Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-03 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue, Brown and Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy M33 is much better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a general score of 86.3 against 74.1. Galaxy M33 is a thinner but a little bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Samsung Galaxy M33 has just a little better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M33, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy M33, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy M33 has a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy M33 features a much better battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.