Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s score of 74.1. Samsung Galaxy M51's body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it is somewhat heavier. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Galaxy M51 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater amount of RAM and 2 more CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 133 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.