Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a general score of 81.2 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an older device than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but Samsung managed to make it thinner and a bit lighter. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little sharper screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), although it has a way lower number of pixels per inch of display and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, they both have a same size display. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little longer battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a lot more MP camera in the back, a much bigger back camera sensor and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.