Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-03 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting an 80.4 score against 74.1. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a newer device, and it is also just a little bit lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Both of them have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a better pixel quantity per screen inch and a screen of the same size.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3200mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.