Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a score of 77.7 against 74.1. Galaxy Note3's body is just a little bit lighter and much thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note3 features a bit better performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), although it has lesser cores , they both have 3 GB of RAM.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a same size display, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a better pixel number per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a way bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has an external SD slot that supports up to 128 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 features just a little better battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.