Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-03 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a global score of 77.6 against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 body is much thinner and just a little lighter than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), despite of the fact that it was released only 11 months before. Galaxy Note4 features a bit faster processor than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Galaxy Note4 also has a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Both of them have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, a display of the same size and the same screen density. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a back facing camera with much more MP.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 7% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.