Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-03 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a score of 79.5 against 74.1. Galaxy Note7 is a newer device, and it is also a little lighter and incredibly thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Galaxy Note7 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) and Samsung Galaxy Note7 both count with really similar displays, both have a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, the same resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a display of the same size. Galaxy Note7 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB.
Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.