Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a overall score of 89.7 against 74.1. The Galaxy S10 Lite design is notably newer and notably thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it's a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a little bit better display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy S10 Lite takes better videos and photos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos, a much more mega-pixels camera and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.