Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a overall score of 86.3 against 74.1. The Galaxy S10e is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage. The Galaxy S10e features just a little better processing power than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more CPU cores and more RAM memory.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a larger sensor taking better quality photographs.
Galaxy S10e has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.