Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a 94.8 score against 74.1. The Galaxy S20 body is much newer, just a little lighter and noticeably thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a little higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a little bigger screen and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 features a quite better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lot worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor, a bigger aperture and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has greater battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.