Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a global score of 89.1, which is way better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s overall score of 74.1. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's body is notably newer, a little bit lighter and much thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Galaxy S21 FE has just a little better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel density. Galaxy S21 FE has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a much better battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a much better 21 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.