Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is much newer and incredibly thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it's noticeably heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit faster processor than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger aperture, a much larger sensor and a camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.