Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S24 FE has a global score of 76, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s score of 74.1. Galaxy S24 FE's construction is somewhat heavier but extremely thinner than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a bit sharper display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and way lesser pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video and a lot lower resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy S24 FE has just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S24 FE features a really longer battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.