Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is way better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s general score of 74.1. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and lighter cellphone than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a quite lower pixel amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a greater camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger aperture, a way larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.