Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a general score of 77.6, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 global score. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a notably newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), although it is also incredibly heavier. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster).
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4050mAh battery size. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 21 megapixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.