Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-09-03 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a score of 79 against 74.1. Xperia XZ2 Compact's body is incredibly newer and a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, although it's also just a little thicker. Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 1 GB more RAM memory and 2 more CPU cores.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), although it has a little bit smaller screen, a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the display. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lower video resolution and a camera in the back with lesser megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same internal storage, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.