Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a global score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s score of 74.1. TCL 20 Pro 5G's body is much newer and thinner than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it is just a little heavier. TCL 20 Pro 5G features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM and 2 more processing cores.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixels count in each display inch. The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB and 192 GB more internal memory.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a very superior battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.