Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a global score of 84.5, which is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s general score of 74.1. Xiaomi 14T Pro's design is extremely newer and much thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it's also heavier. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little bit worse pixels density and a little worse resolution of 1220 x 2712, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser cores. Xiaomi 14T Pro has a very superior camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.