Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Plastic | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a 90.7 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra body is notably newer and way thinner than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, although it's much heavier. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much better display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a bigger screen, a little better display density and a little higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger camera aperture for better images and video in low light environments and a bigger sensor.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.