Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is a lot better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting an 89 score against 74.1. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is a a lot newer and extremely thinner cellphone than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it is noticeably heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a better performing CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a way better resolution camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a very superior battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.