Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with an 84.3 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 design is notably newer and much thinner, but also heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has lesser cores and a lower amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a more vivid screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit worse pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a higher resolution of 2224 x 2488. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a lot better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations, a way better video quality and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 70 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.