Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is just a bit better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a global score of 80.6 against 74.1. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it is also somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a little faster CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a bit better looking display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit worse pixels count per screen inch and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a better camera than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a camera in the back with a way better 64 MP resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a superior battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 5260mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.