Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.59 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2912 x 1224 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 458 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4780mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mix Flip is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a overall score of 83.2 against 74.1. Although the Xiaomi Mix Flip is a little heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's extremely thinner and notably newer. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mix Flip, although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores.
Xiaomi Mix Flip has a much better looking display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit worse 1224 x 2912 pixels resolution and a quite inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen. The Xiaomi Mix Flip has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mix Flip captures better videos and photos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution, a way better video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations. Xiaomi Mix Flip has a really longer battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 4780mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.