Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a global score of 78.2, which is just a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s global score of 74.1. Even though the Xiaomi Poco M3 is a bit heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's thinner and a lot newer. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a bit superior CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a bit better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations, a larger back camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a way better battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.