Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a global score of 79.3 against 74.1. The Xiaomi Poco X2 design is extremely newer and extremely thinner than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it's heavier. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots much better photographs and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a way better battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.