Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 general score. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's construction is much newer and thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, although it is also somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a larger aperture, a back camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a superior battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 72% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.